Help us serve you better. Take a five minute survey. Click here!



Archived message board.

Angelfish tank

Badmans Tropical Fish Message Center: General message area: Angelfish tank


Saturday, March 09, 2002 - 07:50 pm
am purchasing a new 40 gallon tank, and would like to put angels in it. my ph is very high out of the tap, and the water is fairly hard. understand that angels like low ph. have read numerous posts about fooling around with the ph level, and am reluctant to go that route.

any suggestions.



Sunday, March 10, 2002 - 12:30 am
I'd say the EASIEST way to get around this is to get an RO unit, but that's probably not the most practical or affordable way to go.

If you have any friends, relatives, or even a place you work that has city water that has a lower pH and softer water, I might recommend taking a couple buckets every day and using that. It might be inconveinient, but compared to the time and money you'd spend monitoring your pH and adding chemicals etc... to get the pH down, its a much better option. After you get the tank set-up, just keep a couple five gallon buckets around filled with the same water for water changes, etc...

Of course, if you live somewhere where you city water is this way, this won't help a whole lot.

Filtering the water through Peat Moss can be effective, but generally stains the water...similar to when making tea. The water stays clear, but is sort of tea colored.

I've never used any chemicals or pH lowerers, so I can't say how well they work, but I DO know that it takes a lot of monitoring to make sure the pH stays low. Honestly, your best chances are RO, or Spring water, or findind a source that has water with a lower pH that you could use for basically free...buying water can be a drag, but if you want angels, might be one of your few options if your pH is VERY high.

Of course, you might get away with starting with water with a lower pH, and overtime, increase the pH simply by using your tap water and mixing it in with the other water you use. As long as its not sudden, the Angels "Might" be ok for a while in the higher pH...I've never done it myself though with angels, so I couldn't say for sure.



Sunday, March 10, 2002 - 08:02 am
Nancy there is absolutely no reason you cannot keep angels at a higher ph. Kick had some for years at her ph. Angels West in California breeds angels at a ph of 8.0. I kept my own angels at a ph of 7.6-7.8 for at least two years before deciding to mess around with a ro unit. The main reason for my RO was to get all the calcium deposits out of the water. I hated all the white gunk on my filters etc... G if you are talking bottled spring water I really have to disagree here as I tested that stuff with my Ph kit and it's higher than my tap water. Distilled water is the water with a low ph, but you have to be sure they haven't used copper equipment in the distilling process. If you don't believe this buy a bottle of each at the local grocery and ph test away! G is the only one so far on the board that seems to like to mess around with ph and we don't seem to be able to break him of the habit. There are only a few PH sensitive fish that you need worry about and angels are just not one of them!



Sunday, March 10, 2002 - 08:54 pm
I should have addressed this post to Terri. BTW the biggest problem with angels is adding them to a tank that is less than six months old. So if you have a new tank it's really best to be patient. I almost gave up on them in the beginning, but funny once my tanks were over six months old my angels had no problems. I now have four of them that are all over five years old.



Monday, March 11, 2002 - 02:34 am
Without going into a lot of detail, I have seen more than one instance in which customers with a higher pH had trouble keeping tetras and other low pH-loving fish alive, but after switching to African Cichlids or Central American livebearers, they had no more troubles keeping fish alive.

This is probably the best short response I can give as to why I like to be concerned with pH.

I'm also more concerned with pH, because a lot of the fish I have require a lower pH to spawn, and when ANY fish is kept in its ideal environment, it will generally be happier, spawn more readily, and (while not necessarily a large amount of time) will live a little longer...



Monday, March 11, 2002 - 07:12 am
Aquarium Fish magazine just recently had an article on Discus being kept and "YES" actually bred at a relatively high ph. It's in the new issue of the magazine and I suggest you read it. Fish that have been bred over the years in our aquariums are constantly adjusting to higher ph. The fish hatcheries and farms are aware that the USA typically has high ph and hard water. They want to sell these tropical fish to people who can succesfully keep them, hence the continued research and breeding at higher ph. If you purchase any wild caught fish you will have a lot of problems if they are not kept in their environment, but this is simply not true any longer for most tank bred fish! Yes it's always better to try to match your fish to your water, but some people just don't want to keep Rainbow,Livebearers or African Rift Lake fish!



Monday, March 11, 2002 - 07:15 am
Another word on the Discus article. The author does have low ph and just mentions in passing that these fish are being bred a couple of places at high ph. Discus are still pretty sensitive fish and you are making things harder on yourself if you do try to keep them(they need a lot of high volume water changes!).



Monday, March 11, 2002 - 08:55 pm
am willing to give it a go, and would not have a problem waiting until the tank "seasons". why would it make a difference, though, with the tank being 6 mo old as opposed to simply being fully cycled.

for whatever it is worth, the lfs suggested adding sodium biphosphate to reduce the ph, but i am skeptical.



Tuesday, March 12, 2002 - 01:05 am
I guess the short version didn't suffice, so here's the long one:

I think the main problem with this pH discussion is that we have two people on two different wavelengths.

What I keep hearing from Joyce is that fish that generally like a lower pH CAN be kept in a higher pH...sometimes even bred, and usually with very few, if any, problems.

I'm not disputing this fact.

What I am saying (or at least want to be saying) is that while this is true, you still have to be aware that you're taking a fish and putting it in an environment in which it doesn't USUALLY live. Perhaps some of this has to do with where you live. If you live somewhere where the fish store's water and your water at home are identical, then acclimating fish is not a problem, as they have already been acclimated at the fish store (whether the pH is high or low). Where I live and work, the store's water is the same as most of the customers, but our pH is significantly lower than that of the customers who have well water. It is in THESE cases that I urge people to be more cautious, and take time acclimating fish (it is also in these cases that it is a lot more common for people to have trouble keeping fish that like a lower pH alive...once again, I'm not arguing that fish that like a lower pH can't be kept in a higher pH, I'm simply stating a fact that I have been witnessed many, many times...if this wasn't a fact that I have witnessed over and over, I wouldn't be so stubborn about it). Starting out by filling your tank with water with a lower pH and slowly adding some tapwater of the higher pH every water change is simply one way (and usually a very effective way) to acclimate fish to a higher pH. This certainly isn't the only way, but it is probably one of the slowest ways, and slow usually translates to a less stressful and more successful acclimation.

I probably also should have said, that a large number of the fish I keep ARE wild caught, and in those cases, its important to both me and the fish, that I keep them in an environment as close to that from which they came. For me, it is simply a way to protect my investment. I realize most tetras are only a couple $, so losing one won't be a big deal. In my case, a loss would be considerably more than that, so naturally, I'm concerned with keeping my fish happy and stress-free.

So, let's please stop talking about pH...I'm not disagreeing with you Joyce, I'm simply stating what I have observed from my personal experiences. It is my belief that an educated fish hobbyist is a successful fish hobbyist. If its me, I simply like as much input from as many different (reliable) sources as possible.

"Please take all information given as a matter of opinion, not as rock solid fact. There are many schools of thought on fish care and everyone does things differently." No answer is wrong.

By the way, Terri, messing around with chemicals and other additives to lower pH artificially is, in my opinion, a big pain. Adding driftwood to the tank may help lower the pH a little (in most of my tanks, my driftwood takes the pH from 7.6 to tanks with a LOT of driftwood, maybe as low as 7.3 or 7.2). I would honestly use RO water rather than mess with chemicals if you are concerned with lowering your pH (maybe start out with half RO, half tap, or even two thirds RO, one third tap...if you want to do that...its totally up to you). As I said above, the RO water will start your tank out with a lower pH, and you can gradually raise the pH by doing smaller water changes using tap water to replace the water you take out.

If you AREN'T too concerned with lowering pH, then simply disregard what I said, and give it a go.

As for the 6 month waiting period, I'm sure 6 months wouldn't hurt, but I've known people who waited only 6 weeks to add angels, and they never had a problem (I even know a few people who cycled their tank with angels...which made me cringe when they told me, but it did work for them...I definitely would NOT recommend it).
Just goes to show, diff'rent strokes for diff'rent folks, so to speak.

This of course, is simply my opinion...



Tuesday, March 12, 2002 - 10:14 am
Hey I've kept these fish for five years and I really could zip Kick a quick email to get her expertise added to mine. G all of our moderators and older board members have repeatedly had this discussion and fight with you on PH. It is a lot more dangerous for new fishkeepers to experiment with water chemistry. If you've been keeping your fish for lots of years and want to mess around go right ahead(of course if you forget to test your water regularily you may end up killing off your fish anyways). I know for a fact that Kick lives in the same city as you and has even been to the same store where you work and she keeps angels at a higher ph. I can also site many AQ fish magazine articles from columnists that back up my point on fish being succesfully kept at a high ph. Face it many new fish people cannot afford to invest 100 dollars in a RO system! Also if you buy new fish at many of the LFS stores around here in Michigan they keep them all at a HIGH ph that matches our tap! The shock of transfering them from a ph 7.6-7.8 to a ph of 7.0 or lower is just not the best situation. I also have driftwood in my tank and it did not affect my ph in the slightest.

Another point is that very few people want to or have the time to breed angelfish. Most angels will cannabilize their eggs so removing them and transferring to another tank is advisable. Hatching and raising tiny fry can become very problematic and time consuming for the average person. The profits realized from the brood usually do not justify the time, energy and effort that have been invested. Most fish keepers just want an attractive addition to their tanks and buying an angel and keeping it at 7.6-7.8 is not really a big deal!

Terri I messed around with a phosphate based chem and from MY EXPERIENCE ended up with a tank full of algae. If you insist and must take G's advise go out and spend 100 on a RO unit. Also be prepared to move countless buckets of water to your fish tank from a storage container after you have spent MANY hours collecting it. This has been the major drawback to my certainly will give you lots of excercise and help build your muscles.

I really don't know where your 'well water' bit came into the picture? I don't think Terri mentioned that in any of her post so wouldn't you say that's taking things a bit off topic?



Tuesday, March 12, 2002 - 10:31 am
"taking a fish and putting it in an environment in which it doesn't USUALLY live. " This statement has been made in the past, do any of these tropical fish really live in little glass boxes in the wild?
Anyways to sum up this whole discussion...I think in her original post Terri stated that she was reluctant to fool around with ph and wanted to keep an angelfish. Keeping things in line with her question and giving a BRIEF answer. Yes it if perfectly fine to keep an angel at a high ph.



Tuesday, March 12, 2002 - 12:45 pm
This is the final time I will say this:
I'm NOT disagreeing with you, Joyce, on the FACT (by definition,as taken from, Fact means:Knowledge or information based on real occurrences...IF I didn't agree with you, I would call this a theory or a hypothesis, but I'm calling it a fact, so I obviously agree) that some fish can be kept in a higher pH even if they are normally found in water with a lower pH. In fact, as I read your entire response to my previous post, it became quite apparent that you're either not reading my posts, or are completely misinterpreting them (and putting words into my mouth in the process).

My "Well Water bit" came into the picture because I was citing a REAL LIFE occurence where pH out of someones tap is much higher than the pH at the store where they buy their fish. I realize this isn't always the case, but it is around where I live, and is a very valid and pertinent example as it deals with differences in pH and acclimating and keeping fish (this was one of the main points backing my argument, so perhaps if you didn't understand this, this is why you didn't understand the rest of my post). You might not have to deal with this, but it doesn't mean other people don't. My post wasn't addressed solely to Terri until I get to the part where I say "By the way, Terri." Maybe this is where some of this apparent confusion is coming from. I never said to buy an RO unit, I never said I messed with pH chemicals, and I never said anything about breeding Angels. You, Joyce, are the one that said to go buy an RO unit, that I mess with pH chemicals, and talked about breeding Angels.

Is it just me, or does it seem like Joyce is responding to a post that is completely different from what I wrote? I agree with her, and she seemingly responds by attacking what I said, and reinforcing her point that I have agreed with since day one.

By the way, you never know when a cargo ship full of glass boxes might sink and trap fish in them in the be careful what you ask for...

I'm tired of typing for now, but I'm sure I'll have plenty more to talk about later...



Wednesday, March 13, 2002 - 07:05 am
'I've never used any chemicals or pH lowerers, so I can't say how well they work, but I DO know that it takes a lot of monitoring to make sure the pH stays low. Honestly, your best chances are RO, or Spring water, or findind a source that has water with a lower pH "

G you were the first one to mention a RO unit not me. I was actually agreeing with you that it is safer to use this method than to mess with chemicals. So I guess since I'm listing your quote I really cannot be misinterpreting it or putting a word in your mouth! You may not have said to BUY one but you suggested using RO. How the heck else can someone use it unless they buy a unit? Maybe you have a state of the art store, but the many stores I've visited on both ends of my state do not. None of the stores in five years that I've been in have RO water for sale and I've traveled to at least 20 stores!

As far as the well water bit...fine to site examples, but my Eleven year old gets marked down in school when he takes papers way off topic, so maybe you should have started another thread. The poor girl just asked if she could keep an angel at a high ph...not what to do if she ever buys a house with well water.

As far as the breeding I mentioned it first, but in referance to a store that was trying to genetically adapt fish to a higher ph(Angels West) this was the only reference until you brought up the following on spawning.....
The fact that your fish needed a low ph to spawn(March 11 2:34 AM) so even though you didn't metion breeding angels when you talk of spawning and lower ph in a post entitled ANGELFISH TANK one assumes that's what you are in fact referring to??? Maybe if you would have mentioned the type of fish you were speaking of things would have been more apparent.
I try to keep my posts relevant to the topic. I could go get my books and tell Terri about livebearers, diseases and all kind of stuff, but I think she just wanted an answer about angelfish.



Friday, March 15, 2002 - 05:05 am
Hey Terri! - don't mess with the water! I skimmed over Joyce and G's posts so I have no idea why they are arguing - everyone has a different opinion. Neither Joyce nor G are wrong - you would be fine to follow advice from wither of them. But forget about them for a moment - here is some advice from me . . .

I only started keeping fish a few months ago (less than 1/2 a year ago) - I have no water test kits! I never have and I'm starting to wonder if I ever will. I don't really know what my pH is (probably about 7.5 from what I've heard in the LFS though). At first I considered fiddling with the the pH, hardness etc. But now I don't care - all I worry about is keeping my tanks clean (regular water changes, cleaning filters, not too many fish all at once, etc.) Fish are fine in different pH water (as long as its not extreme like lower than 5 or higher than 9).

Try to get you're angels from a LFS with similar water to yours and acclimate them to your tank slowly (about 1 hour). But I do recommend that you let the tank age about 6 months before you get angels - keep some other fish in their for a while. Don't have any more than two angels in there - not enough room for more. Just watch your fish and keep the tank healthy. That's all you need to worry about. I recommend 1/4 water changes twice a week (that's what I do).

Forget about changing pH - its over-rated (unless you're seriously into biotopes and breeding difficult fish). Besides if you do alter the tank water then at every water change you will need to alter the new water - it takes long enough to get the temp. right let alone anything else!

Good tank maintenance, on the other hand, is underated. Change the water! Clean the filter! Understand your fish! Think before fore you buy! AND RESEARCH! . . . this is all you need to worry about!

Just practice good tank maintenance and enjoy your fish!!!



Friday, March 15, 2002 - 10:14 am
for the record, the exchange of "different points of view" has, from my perspective, been very interesting and educational. my strong preference is not to fool around with the ph of my new tank. nevertheless, i am concerned with some types of fish in my high ph water, and that was the basis of the question.

i would like an angelfish tank because i like to look at them and i like their behaviour. i do not intend to breed. my next tank (finances permittingwill be a discus tank. it seems that every time i move up the scale, my water paramaters become more of an issue.

so this is actually a bit of pre planning. i am trying to make an informed decision about addressing my ph issue which will work for both fish types. since my original post, i have done the following:

1. Read the article in acquarium fish mag. needless to say, its encouraging. it suggests that higher ph can be tolerated, but suggest younger fish are more adaptable. good advice for angels, i suspect.

2. Actually purchased some sodium biphosphate. not too expensive. it works, but it takes some tinkering. not certain of the longer term affects. (did not put it in the tank, but a large bucket still skeptical, but i would not want to "experiment" with my fish.

3. tank is set up and is being cycled..should be ready shortly. will stock with some fish out of my other tanks prior to adding the angels, and will make ph adjustments (if any!) prior to their arrival.

For whatever its worth, my lfs keeps their ph neutral. its not like anyone's water around here. i assume that help's them keep the fish when they get them, but acclimation is a problem.



Friday, March 15, 2002 - 07:41 pm
Terri thanks for the votes on our discussion. Stick with the pros and keep up with reading Aquarium Fish magazine. There are some really good articles. Also if you can still get Tropical Fish magazine they used to have a Discus column by Jack W(a big discus breeder in Florida). Anyways I thought his ideas really interesting although a lot of discus people argue with him too! He sure has beutiful discus pics!


Navigation panel.